kimi-k3
Long text
1M budget and long-text reasoning channel.
Configuration record
Kimi K3 appears on Floatboat’s current pricing page and has an older long-text capacity record. Check the current client entry and plan before relying on the historical model ID.
Configured below the picker
What do you want to finish?
Kimi K3 is configured for long-text workloads, but the October 9, 2026 record did not show it in the main picker; current client access needs a fresh check.
Strength
The configured profile is aimed at context-heavy synthesis.
Scale
Capacity is registered for large inputs.
Compatibility
Economic profiles recognize `kimi-k2` and `kimi-latest`.
Boundary
The model has a capacity configuration but no current client selection entry.
The recorded Kimi profile uses a specific model identity alongside documented aliases and capacity assumptions. Use those details to understand the configuration, then check the current client route before treating a profile or public listing as an available execution option.
Long text
1M budget and long-text reasoning channel.
Configuration record
Long-source synthesis and whole-document review require reliable access as well as sufficient context. These examples connect source relationships and cross-section checks with task planning, while keeping historical Kimi configuration records separate from current availability.
Once access is confirmed, long-form research can compare claims across extensive sources without losing their relationships. Keep the research question explicit and retain attribution and differing views throughout the synthesis. The finished analysis should expose evidence gaps instead of presenting an unsupported agreement between sources.
Reviewing a long document requires attention to connections between distant sections. Use the stated review criteria to compare claims, definitions, and conditions across the full text, beyond isolated section summaries. Locate findings precisely and explain whether the document remains consistent when its parts are read together.
Before planning a task around a recorded Kimi model, compare its scale with the current client menu and route requirements. Check the model identifier and budget assumptions separately from actual access. Keep execution prerequisites and unconfirmed steps visible so a configuration record does not become an availability promise.
Before a long review, map important claims, definitions, and evidence to their locations in the supplied material. Keep the original terminology and document relationships so later questions can return to the right passage. Use an available Kimi route only after checking access, and distinguish an index for navigation from a conclusion about the strength of the evidence.
Exact model identity, long-text configuration, and access status answer different questions about Kimi. The entries below retain those distinctions, helping you assess context requirements without treating a recorded runtime budget as proof that your current account can use the route.
The registered model ID is `kimi-k3`.
A 1M budget is configured for the model.
The runtime includes support for long-text reasoning workloads.
Kimi K3 is not shown in the October 9, 2026 main-picker snapshot.
Compare model families by the kind of work they support. Availability differs by model and entry point.
kimi-k3; kimi-k2 and kimi-latest are recognized compatibility names.Choose a source set, a research question, and citation rules. Confirm Kimi access in the current menu before comparing how candidate models retain disagreements and evidence gaps.